The Field Density Test (FDT) under BS 1377: Part 9 involves determining the in-situ density of compacted soil. This test ensures that the soil's compaction meets design requirements. BS 1377: Part 9 outlines various field test methods for assessing soil properties.
Common Methods for FDT in BS 1377 Part 9:
Sand Replacement Method:
- A known volume of soil is removed, and the void is filled with calibrated sand.
- The weight of sand used gives the volume of the hole.
- The in-situ density is calculated by dividing the weight of the excavated soil by the volume of the hole.
Core Cutter Method:
- A cylindrical metal core cutter is driven into the soil to extract a sample.
- The weight and volume of the soil in the cutter are used to calculate the in-situ density.
- Typically used for cohesive soils.
Nuclear Density Gauge:
- Measures density and moisture content using nuclear radiation.
- This method is faster and non-intrusive but requires specialized equipment and training.
Key Aspects to Consider:
- Preparation: Ensure the soil surface is level and free of debris for accurate testing.
- Calibration: Equipment, especially for the sand replacement and nuclear gauge methods, must be calibrated properly.
- Moisture Content: It is essential to determine the moisture content of the soil, as it impacts compaction and density.
- Safety: Follow safety protocols, especially when using the nuclear gauge.
The Sand Replacement Method is a widely used field test under BS 1377: Part 9 to determine the in-situ density of soil. Here's a comprehensive, step-by-step explanation of the process:
Objective:
To determine the in-situ density of compacted soil for quality assurance of earthworks and embankments.
Equipment Required:
- Sand Pouring Cylinder:
- A calibrated cylindrical container with a cone-shaped pouring nozzle.
- Calibrated Sand:
- Dry, uniform sand with a known density (calibration done in a controlled environment).
- Metal Tray:
- A flat, circular tray with a central hole for creating the test excavation.
- Weighing Balance:
- Sensitive enough to measure weights accurately.
- Moisture Content Equipment:
- Oven, container, and balance to determine soil moisture content.
- Tools for Excavation:
- Small spade, scraper tool, or similar implements.
- Measuring Tape:
- For measuring dimensions of the hole (if necessary).
Pre-Test Preparation:
Site Selection:
- Identify the area where the compaction or in-situ density needs to be tested.
- Ensure the surface is level and free of debris.
Calibration of Sand:
- Determine the bulk density of the sand by pouring it into a pre-calibrated container of known volume.
- Record the mass of sand and calculate the density using:
Testing Procedure:
1. Prepare the Test Area:
- Place the metal tray on the soil surface, ensuring it's flat.
- Use the central hole in the tray as a guide to cut a small, neat hole in the soil.
- Carefully excavate the soil up to the required depth (~10-15 cm for most cases), collecting and weighing the excavated soil.
2. Measure the Volume of the Hole:
- Place the sand pouring cylinder over the metal tray hole.
- Open the valve to allow sand to flow and fill the hole completely, including the cone below the cylinder.
- Close the valve once sand stops flowing.
- Weigh the remaining sand in the cylinder to calculate the amount of sand used.
Calculate Volume:
3. Determine the Soil Mass and Moisture Content:
- Weigh the excavated soil to get the total mass.
- Take a representative sample of the excavated soil for moisture content determination using the oven-drying method.
- Calculate the dry mass of the soil using:
4. Calculate the In-Situ Density:
- The in-situ dry density is calculated as:
Post-Test Calculations:
Compare with Specification:
- Compare the dry density obtained with the specified compaction requirement.
- Typically, results are expressed as a percentage of the Maximum Dry Density (MDD) obtained from laboratory compaction tests (e.g., Proctor test).
Advantages:
- Accurate and reliable for small-scale in-situ density determination.
- Simple and cost-effective equipment.
Limitations:
- Time-consuming compared to modern methods like nuclear density gauges.
- Errors may arise from improper sand calibration or uneven soil surfaces.
- Unsuitable for very coarse or granular soils.
Tips for Accurate Results:
- Ensure sand is dry and uniform.
- Minimize disturbances around the test area.
- Perform multiple tests for consistency.
- Regularly calibrate the pouring cylinder and sand density.
Tags:
CivilEngineering